CO129-310 - Acting Governor Major Gen Gascoigne - 1902 [1-4] — Page 428

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Series Prev Next

fact that the Judian Gaol staff, reunid

micrease

agree with

ари

recarid an

you

the request for ofsaley

Staubst

in 1899

that

an increase

carmot be

di the

3. As regards Auctors question of Family Remittance finitzer,

to reconsider

the decision announcedii

my disf. No 8 of the

6th January 1899, and reaffermid

No.85 of 12 May

1899

I hands

No. 136241

No. 112

1902 March

(Subject.)

Naval Reserver

424

DESPAT

0.0

15027

Real 23 APR 12

8729

t previous Paper.

Leeds copy further

corres as

to brown

purchase for

areas the Adeveralty might wish to

If Copy to Adony 1. May

CO $8851

> # B & L (75) --30051~~24000-17-01

Sextsubsequent Paper.

Adway

13888

Mr. Johnson

(Minutes.)

I don't much like the suggestion - the stipulation is for a four days' notice "in order that the requirements of naval defence

But? appro

stated!

26/4

The proposal here is better then.

that foreshadowed in 1952. the mae not approve, but rend coby to

admy in reply with ref. 287 29 for info con

R.2

alonce

Edit History

2026-06-01 08:17:10 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

fact that the Judian Gaol staff, reunid micrease agree with ари recarid an you the request for ofsaley Staubst in 1899 that an increase carmot be di the 3. As regards Auctors question of Family Remittance finitzer, to reconsider the decision announcedii my disf. No 8 of the 6th January 1899, and reaffermid No.85 of 12 May 1899 I hands J No. 136241 No. 112 1902 March (Subject.) Naval Reserver 424 Re DESPAT 0.0 15027 Real 23 APR 12 8729 t previous Paper. Leeds copy further corres as to brown purchase for areas the Adeveralty might wish to If Copy to Adony 1. May CO $8851 > # B & L (75) --30051~~24000-17-01 Sextsubsequent Paper. Adway 13888 Mr. Johnson (Minutes.) I don't much like the suggestion - the stipulation is for a four days' notice "in order that the requirements of naval defence But? appro re stated! AF 26/4 The proposal here is better then. that foreshadowed in 1952. the mae not approve, but rend coby to admy in reply with ref. 287 29 for info con R.2 alonce

Baseline (Original)

fact that the Judian Gaol staff, reunid micrease agree with ари recarid an you the request for ofsaley Staubst in 1899 that an increase carmot be di the 3. As regards Auctors question of Family Remittance finitzer, حمل บ to reconsider the decision announcedii my disf. No 8 of the desh 6th January 1899, and reaffermid No.85 of 12 May 1899 ні I hands J No. 136241 No. 112 1902 March (Subject.) Naval Reserver 424 Re DESPAT 0.0 15027 Real 23 APR 12 8729 t previous Paper. Leeds copy further corres as to brown purchase for areas the Adeveralty might wish to If Copy to Adony 1. May CO $8851 > # B & L (75) --30051~~24000-17-01 Sextsubsequent Paper. Adway 13888 Mr. Johnson (Minutes.) I don't much like the suggestion - the stipulation is for a for days' notice "in order that the equirements of naval defence But? appro re stated! жазва AF 26/4 The propseal here is better then. that foreshadowed in 1952. the mae not approve, but rend coby to admy in reply with ref. 287 29 for info con R.2 alonce

2026-06-01 08:17:10 · Baseline

View content